>
India's fastest online shopping destination
Gift Cards
Donate Stationery Kits
Help Center
Sell On Snapdeal
Download App
Cart

Sorry! Berks County Law Journal (Volume 7) is sold out.

Compare Products
Clear All
Let's Compare!

Berks County Law Journal (Volume 7)

This product has been sold out

pay
Rs  1,783
We will let you know when in stock
notify me

Featured

Highlights

  • ISBN13:9781154389043
  • ISBN10:1154389049
  • Publisher:General Books
  • Language:English
  • Author:Randolph Stauffer
  • Binding:Paperback
  • Sub Genre:General
  • SUPC: SDL648891562

Description

Learn More about the Book

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1915. Excerpt: ... of contributory negligence on the part of the deceased, the direction of a verdict for defendant was imperative; and therefore, The rule to show cause is discharged. BALTHASERrvs. BITNER et al. Attachment Execution--Garnishee's Title. 1. A mere depositary or bailee of money, with an interest in it only upon the order or approval of the bailor, acquires no title as against an attachment execution issued against the bailor. 2. The general test of liability to garnishment is the garnishee's accountability to defendant, and in order to resist it, the garnishee must have such title or interest in the thing attached that it cannot be taken from him. In the Court of Common Pleas of Berks County. No. 83 January Term, 1!)14. Verdict for plaintiff for ,200.75. Rules by defendant for new trial for judgment non obstante veredicto. J. R. Dickinson and J. Ed. Miller, for Albert J. Raubenhold and Hamburg Savings Bank, Garnishee. J. Milton Miller and Forrest R. Shanaman, for plaintiff. Opinion by Endlich, P. J., May 22, 11)15.--It is conceded on all hands that the question here to be decided is one of law upon an undisputed state of facts shown by the evidence, that the decision of that question is involved in the disposition of the rule for judgment n. o. v., and that the application for a new trial may be disregarded and dismissed. The plaintiff recovered a judgment for #200.75, interest, etc., to No. 8 Dec. Term, 1912, J. D., against Ella Bitner and Emma Boyer, defendants. Sometime in November, 1913, the contemplated alterations and repairs to a certain property, and obtained from Alfred J. Raubenhold, a contractor and builder, an estimate of the probable cost thereof, viz., about ,1,700. Without entering into any specific and binding contract, it was understood betwe...

Terms & Conditions

The images represent actual product though color of the image and product may slightly differ.

Quick links

Seller Details

View Store